TalentEgg Trends

Today’s Talent, Tomorrow’s Leaders

Knowledge Hub For Employers, Career Educators And Coaches

Tag: entry-level (page 7 of 7)

Signals of potential and taking risks, guest post from Paul Crowe

Paul CroweWe’re big fans and proponents of entry level hiring that is based on potential for future success. Last week I wrote about non-academic achievements and their role as a predictor of future career success. This is something I’ve always personally been passionate about as an arts grad running a business, and as someone who sees first-hand the degree bias that so many employers have. In my opinion, when it comes to entry level hiring, a candidate’s potential for future success should be given more weight than their ability to make an impact right away.

Cassandra from our team alerted me to a very relevant post from our friend Paul Crowe. On his blog, Digital Society, Paul highlights how advertising companies need to take more risks when it comes to entry level hiring in order to find top talent. Paul sums up perfectly why business should hire for ‘potential for future success’ when it comes to entry level positions:

For an industry that prides itself on creativity, risk-taking, and being different we do a horrible job on actually delivering on this promise. We will be the first to bitch about a client that isn’t willing to try something new, to take the big risk with their brand or to invest in unknown creative territories. We will also be the first to complain about clients that aren’t looking long-term at brand building but are more focused on immediate activation, sales or traffic drivers.

But then when it comes to our hiring practices we are unable to look beyond immediate needs and are unwilling to take risks. Twice in the past month I have came across examples of agencies that I respect turning down an incredible junior account person because he doesn’t have the “experience required to have an immediate impact”. The young man in question is well educated, as creative as they come, an awesome person and would be an asset to any agency that would just give him a shot on their account team. Does he know how to build a workback schedule for a TV campaign, radio record or POS execution? No. But he will learn fast, probably find ways to improve that process, improve the work and make your clients love your agency even more.

One of the agencies even told me they really wanted to hire him, that he’d be a perfect fit for their culture and loved him – BUT he didn’t have the experience they were looking for. Are you kidding me? This agency prides itself as being a creative leader in Canada and the world; they are known to push brands to take risks but they refuse to take a risk themselves. Let’s be honest, the reason most people don’t work out at an agency is that they aren’t a cultural fit. If you find a cultural fit then chances are they will excel in that environment and deliver more value to you and your clients than someone who can manage that project that starts next week.

That being said I actually hope all agencies continue with this ass backwards approach to hiring. Leave all the great people for me.

For more from Paul, check out Digital Society.

Recent grads are the silver lining

If your network of family and friends is anything like mine, it has undoubtedly been affected by the current economic situation.

While catching up with family over the holidays, I’ve heard a handful of stories from some who have already been laid off and others who are crossing their fingers while co-workers with less seniority are let go.

It was strange to be comparing job searching strategies and resumé writing tips with my relatively wealthy uncle who is in his 50s and has been jobless since October. He’s taking a resumé workshop, filled mostly with other middle-aged workers who have recently lost their jobs as well, while he decides if he wants to go back to work or retire early.

My cousin’s husband recently lost his sales job as well. He was successful enough that my cousin quit her job earlier this year to stay at home with their two young children. Within a few months, they went from being a stable single-income family to a no-income family that has to put plans of moving into a bigger home on the back burner.

I know they’re lucky and things are a lot worse for some others who have been laid off.

Hopefully things will turn around soon, but “experts say” things are only going to get worse in the new year:

As bad as the past few months were, even the rosiest of economic forecasts shows on average Canadians will get poorer in 2009, and many – perhaps as many as 200,000 additional workers – will lose their jobs as the economic recession deepens.

However, we should look at the types of jobs that are being lost. Some are demanding government cash to stay afloat: manufacturing, particularly the auto sector, along with the financial sector, is hemorrhaging jobs. Forestry, retail, travel and tourism, and real estate aren’t great industries to be in either, if you believe all the hype.

But things aren’t all bad.

Currently, Canada’s unemployment rate is sitting at 6.3 per cent and it’s predicted to rise to eight per cent in 2009. Looking back to previous recessions, however, we saw the unemployment rate reach as high as 10 per cent in the early 1990s and 13 per cent in 1980-81.

In fact, some industries, such as IT, the skilled trades and health care, can’t find enough people to fill their jobs. As an educated, motivated work force with comparatively low salary expectations, recent grads are probably in the best position of any group of job candidates in the current economy.

TalentEgg itself is a great indicator that employers are still hiring for a lot of entry-level roles, as Lauren said almost a month ago. TalentEgg wouldn’t exist if they weren’t. New entry-level roles are added to the site almost daily. In particular, agriculture, energy, engineering, health care, management, marketing, sales and technology jobs seem to be the most in demand.

Brazen Careerist founder Penelope Trunk recently posted some encouraging evidence that young workers are holding their own in the current economy:

  • jobs for candidates with little to no experience are increasing
  • there have been and still are plenty of entry-level jobs to be had
  • the unemployment rate for workers with a post-secondary education is much lower than that of the general population

She says “that young people shouldn’t be thrown by the bad news that old people are pushing. Things are not that bad if you’re beginning your career.”

A good indicator of these points might be that while everyone else is cutting back, Gen Y is still spending.

What do you think about the current job market for new grads? Should new grads be worried about finding jobs in 2009, or is Penelope Trunk right?

Employers and students: Not N'Sync

Yes, this is quite possibly the corniest blog title…ever…But never mind that!

A few observations on the disconnect between employers and students in Canada:

In our day-to-day dealing with employers and students, we’ve had the opportunity to pick up on a lot of trends in the entry-level recruitment market.

One that particularly stands out, and that has been coming up a lot lately is the fact that many big-brand employers do their campus recruiting in September for new-grad roles.

I’ve come to understand the reasoning behind it: Whoever’s first to campus gets the best candidates. If you wait too long, all the ‘top’ people are already recruited.

The problem is, the majority of students spend September registering for classes, gathering books, settling into their homes and social lives, joining clubs, trying out for sports teams, etc. For most, September is not the time to think about careers. Actually, scratch that. Most ‘involved’, well-rounded students are not thinking about careers in September.

So this is my conclusion:

For employers searching for students with top grades, or students who put career ahead of all other on-campus events, or students in particular programs where professors and career advisors make sure to alert students to Employers’ September time lines (i.e. accounting programs), September is probably the best time to get on campus and collect those applications.

But if you’re an employer that wants to work with students on THEIR schedules, and perhaps an employer who values extra curriculars over grades, then it might make sense to have a more balanced, full-year plan.

On top of accommodating busy students with conflicting schedules, this method has a few extra benefits:

  • It allows employers to take the time to consider additional aspects of a candidate’s potential fit,
  • It allows for more time to brand your opportunities- stand out from the rest.

Most importantly: Because Oct-Dec and Feb-April are much quieter on campus, it means there’s a chance to find the ‘hidden’ talent and to speak with that talent without all the ‘noise’ that comes with the busy September and January recruiting season.

Newer posts